Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]ECs, Math level, and notable achievements should be considered when evaluating kids against other kids from the same school or any kids in high SES schools against other high SES schools. At a school like Longfellow or Carson, the privileged kid who is winning science olympiad medals, qualifying for AIME, and taking Pre-Calc is much more qualified for TJ than the equally privileged kids who are in Algebra I and haven't accomplished much of anything. If FCPS keeps the 1.5% seat allocation and only looks at ECs etc. relative to the other kids in the same school, then the playing field should be pretty even. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
