Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "Private Schools Value Top Athletes Most"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]There's a more recent study from the lawsuit evidence published in Journal of Labor Economics but available ungated here: http://public.econ.duke.edu/~psarcidi/legacyathlete.pdf Overall they claim: "Our model of admissions shows that roughly three-quarters of white ALDC admits would have been rejected if they had been treated as typical white applicants." ALDC =athlete, legacy, dean's admit list, child of faculty Other interesting findings: "A typical applicant with only a 1% chance of admission would see his admission likelihood increase to 98% if he were a recruited athlete. Being a recruited athlete essentially guarantees admission even for the least-qualified applicants. A similar calculation, but in reverse, emphasizes the advantage athletes receive. An athlete who has an 86% probability of admission—the average rate among athletes—would have only a 0.1% chance of admission absent the athlete tip." "The estimated coefficients on indicators for legacy, double legacy (i.e. both parents are alumni), faculty or staff child, and being on the dean’s interest list are all large, positive, and statistically significant. The odds ratio for legacy is 8.5, and is even larger for double legacies, those on the dean’s interest list, and children of faculty. In a slightly altered model that includes athletes, the odds ratio for athletes exceeds five thousand (see Table D4)." There is a massive admissions advantage to being a recruited athlete, and that advantage disproportionately benefits white students largely because Harvard has an extraordinary number of varsity sports, and therefore athletes, many in sports like skiiing, squash, ice hockey, water polo, crew, etc... [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics