Reply to SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just don't understand why anyone would think a 15 week ban is a good idea.  Just on a purely practical basis, women don't get decent ultrasound information about the viability/physical condition of the fetus until 18-20 weeks.

Having carried a child to birth that had a significant defect, (50% chance of surviving to 5 yrs), it's really crucial for women to have that information, and to make decisions based on that information.  To be forced to carry a child to term knowing that the child may die before birth or thereafter is forcing that woman into psychological trauma.

But, I guess men don't understand the timing of pregnancy info.  [/quote]
You think they give a sit if a woman has to carry a fetus for four more months when she knows it’s doomed? You think they care about the private struggles of a family if a profoundly disabled child is born and the Catholic hospital refuses to just supply comfort care? You think they care if families are bankrupted? They LOVE when people go bankrupt.

[b][i]The cruelty is the point. The GOP hates women.[/i][/b]
[b][i]The cruelty is the point. The GOP hates women.[/i][/b]
[b][i]The cruelty is the point. The GOP hates women.[/i][/b][/quote]

+1000

With a slight change.

The GOP hates anyone who isn’t rich and white.

Everyone else can suffer while they watch with glee. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics