Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So what would an overturning of Roe mean for Assisted Reproductive Technology? I had 6 embryos from my IVF. All were genetically defective so I did not proceed with implantation. Will the destruction of un-implanted embryos be illegal in a post-Roe world?[/quote] Claire McCaskill just said that there’s already a law on the books in Missouri that states that personhood begins at conception. She says that would make IVF illegal.[/quote] Why would that make IVF illegal? [/quote] What do you do with the non implanted embryos? Those are now humans according to state law. What do you do if you never implant? You can't just dispose of the embryos, because that's now murder. [/quote] Since we're just making up rights, laws, and science, now, we can make an exception for those. Not a problem.[/quote] This is the Federalist Society agenda. They have not hidden it. They have bought at least 5 Supreme Court Seats, maybe 6. This is what they want and what is coming, unless we get enough Senators in to make the law and change the balance of the court at the same time. Wake up.[/quote] The irony, of course, is how many FedSoc female lawyers or the wives of male FedSoc lawyers have availed themselves of IVF. It's probably A LOT with that crowd.[/quote] Of course, because it’s not like they actually subscribe to any of the religious nonsense they use to push their corporate, pro billionaire agenda. But it will catch up with them eventually. When in the history of humanity has an extremist religious group moderated when they got what they want? Crazy Eyes Barrett is the future here. [/quote] I'm actually completely fine and support banning IVF now that Roe v. Wade was overturned. I had a ton of faux-liberal white women former friends (I cut them all out of my life as soon as Trump was elected) married to open Trump supporters. All those betches used IVF to get pregnant. Let rich white women, the primary utilizers of IVF, pay the price - you reap what you sow.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics