Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "S/O Surprisingly good Hollywood casting decisions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I guess if we’re going with surprising, then Tom Hanks in Philadelphia. This was the movie that turned him from the comedic leading man into the serious one. [/quote] I thought Hanks was terrible. He was incapable of seeming actually in love with Antonio Banderas. A friend of mine is married to a movie producer, and told me at the time that Philadelphia was “an important movie for Hollywood to make.” I told her it was almost a decade too late to claim that mantle. [b]Hanks got the Oscar because Hollywood thought it was brave to pretend to be gay on film[/b].[/quote] Yup. Just look who else he was nominated with: Anthony Hopkins, The Remains of the Day Daniel Day-Lewis, In the Name of the Father Laurence Fishburne, What's Love Got to Do with It Liam Nelson, Schindler's List It's quite a stretch to claim that Hanks' acting was superior to those four performances. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
