Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "The Urbanist Cult"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think SFHs are addictive. Once you have one you want to keep that style of housing. [/quote] Especially when zoning makes it so that is the only thing that can be built.[/quote] Supply-side nonsense. The vacancy rate for apartments is higher than for single family. No one is being forced to live in a single family home. [/quote] The vacancy rate for apartments needs to be higher than SFH, kiddo. They turn over more quickly. If there was 0 vacancy when what would happen if someone wanted to move to a new apartment? Critical thinking, use it.[/quote] Where did I say that the spread was undesirable? Just saying no one is being forced to live in a SFH, kiddo. It’s a more desired form of housing. That’s why developers keep building them. Try to stay on topic. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
