Reply to Mandatory vaccines for teachers/staff and eligible students

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Mandatory vaccines for teachers/staff and eligible students"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Saying it should be negotiated is not the same as saying it should happen [/quote]

If it shouldn't happen, why bother to negotiate? Certainly, agreeing to negotiate an outcome is not an indication that you oppose that outcome which is the claim made by the earlier poster.
[/quote]

Ok, in labor law, “subject for mandatory bargaining” means that it is an issue that if the employer wants to have happen, they have to negotiate with the union. It does not mean the union is affirmatively bringing the issue to the table because the union wants to consider it. It’s the opposite. It protects the union from management issueing an edict about it.

So AFT saying it is a “subject for mandatory bargaining” means they are asserting their right to force the employer to negotiate over it. And from the rest of the AFT statement (that they don’t think vaccines should be “coereced”) I think we can conclude that when/if the issue is bargained over, they will oppose it. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics