Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "The Absurdity of U.S. News College Rankings - Per Malcolm Gladwell"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yeah what the ill-informed and nasty PP doesn't realize is that the schools that have benefited from rankings the most are the non-Harvard/Yale Ivies. The Ivy League went from being an old-school athletic conference to having the level of prestige they enjoy today. But sure, take it out on these other schools. The confident stupidity and lack of self-awareness truly knows no bounds.[/quote] What a ridiculous post. The Ivies have been the Ivies and ergo have been synonymous with prestige and top academics for a long time, whether deserved or undeserved. This is true in the US and it is true internationally. The smaller Ivies - Brown and Dartmouth - are less recognized by name alone internationally but rather their affiliation to the Ivies. However in the US they have always been prestigious nationally and particularly in the Northeast - the economic and political center of the US. Cornell in particularly is very popular internationally despite Americans desperately trying to compare it to a state school.[/quote] The Ivy League is an athletic conference. USNWR entrenched their status as prestigious schools; they weren't all considered prestigious beforehand.[/quote] +1. The prestige of the Ivy League used to be more about social class and wealth, but USNWR changed that to something more “meritocratic.” In quotations because it’s really not, anyone who thinks USNWR is about merit must be kidding themselves. Had the more academics-based ranking of the ‘50s and ‘60s stayed, the only ivies that deserved meritocratic prestige would have been Harvard, Columbia, Yale, and Princeton. Cornell would also have been in the same grouping and no one would ridicule it as a state school. Penn, Brown, and Dartmouth would have been in the shadows of schools like Chicago and Johns Hopkins. But USNWR’s dubious metrics made it seem that not only are ivies the best schools, but also that undergrad is the only part of a university that matters. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics