Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Expectant and Postpartum Moms
Reply to "Evelyn Muhlhan - another homebirth midwife bites the dust?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm actually OK with banning smoking and drinking for pregnant women. I know it will never happen, but if it did, I'd be fine with it. Perhaps my example with a C-section wasn't right in your eyes. I don't know, pick another complicated scenario where a woman definitely should be under specialized medical care. Multiples? Severe breech? [b]Basically, you're saying that a mother has an unrestrained right to make medical decisions over her birthing process, even if these decisions lead to certain death of her baby, [/b]am I correct? Is this because you have trouble envisaging decisions during birthing that will *absolutely* lead to the baby's death? [/quote] But honestly, what situation are you envisioning here? I honestly cannot ever imagine a homebirther choosing such a thing. As I've said before, I have NEVER met a homebirther -- even one on the so-called "fringe" -- who would choose her homebirth over the safety of her baby. Homebirthers choose their birth because they feel it is the safest for both themselves and their baby. And, for the record, breech babies (not sure what you mean by "severe" breech) and multiples have throughout all of history been born safely at home; and they still today can be born safely at home with a skilled midwife.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics