Reply to JD preferred jobs

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "JD preferred jobs"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The fact that you say “real eDiscovery”  and thumb your nose at others is just one of the many examples of how the legal profession is a caste system. Partners and associates view you the same way. That bothers you so you abuse those you believe are lower than you. You probably didn’t go to a very good law school, you probably didn’t do well even if you did go to a “top school”. You are part of the problem why the legal profession is so toxic and why the people are so miserable with lots of addiction problems. [/quote]

Wow.  You have one heck of a chip on your shoulder.  Doc reviewers claiming they're an e-discovery professional would be like a chiropractor claiming to be a neurosurgeon.  It's not 'toxic' to point out that they're not accurately representing themselves.[/quote]

New poster here. The way I see it, e-discovery professionals are career doc reviewers. They may not be in the same immediate family, but they're definitely first cousins.[/quote]

eDiscovery PM job description: [url]https://careers.leidos.com/jobs/6459612-ediscovery-project-manager?tm_job=R-00051221&tm_event=view&tm_company=2502&bid=326[/url]

Attorney Document Reviewer job description: [url]https://ldiscovery.taleo.net/careersection/10/jobdetail.ftl?job=14093&tz=GMT-04%3A00&tzname=America%2FNew_York[/url]

Maybe OP should look at the second link, they state that they offer career advancement, and, assuming full-time work, the pay would be closer to $60K v. their $45K.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics