Reply to Pope says no to blessing same-sex unions

Forum Index » Religion

Reply to "Pope says no to blessing same-sex unions"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]So everything hangs on the assumption that Jesus "would have" condemned homosexuality, even though he said nothing about it. And even though he rejected the Old Law.
[/quote]

You make an argument from silence ([i]argumentum ex silentio[/i]) that 'because Jesus did not specifically mention homosexuality, it is not a sin.'  Jesus did not mention wife beating or bestiality so those are okay then?

Of course not.

It is absolutely clear that homosexuality is a sin. Not only that, even from a non-religious standpoint it is abnormal.

--True Fact--

It is biologically impossible for two people of the same sex "mating" with one another to produce offspring.

This is observed science with over 6,000 years of direct evidence that 2 people of the same sex cannot produce babies. It is biologically impossible.  For procreation to occur, it requires the sperm from a male and an egg from a female.

This is what is dividing the church:  will Christians call out an obvious sin like homosexuality, or will they out of fear try to get along with the evil world by saying, "Oh, it's okay, not a big deal...blah blah blah, Jesus did not specifically mention it..."

When people refuse to accept that God made us male and female, it is rebellion against God.  It is why Jesus will say to them "Depart from me you lawless ones."  It says in scripture God gives these people over to a reprobate mind.

Even children understand it takes a man and a woman to make babies because it is such an elementary concept backed up by direct observation from nature.  But wicked elements in our culture, whose home base is in the Democratic party, want to teach these children something different from the truth, hence, you see all the transgender drama going on in a vain attempt to normalize the abnormal.   [/quote]

Wait.. what?.. where did you get the  6000 from? Are  you referring to Neolith, if so this is random and inaccurate.. otherwise
also a question what do you think is observed before?...

[i]This is observed science with over 6,000 years of direct evidence that 2 people of the same sex cannot produce babies.[/i]

was it possible before then?  :shock: [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics