Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Parenting Discussion
Reply to "Would you rather have a baby at 20 or 40?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OMG! 20 for sure! I had my oldest at 23. My youngest at 33. I’m 53 and they are all out of the house. I have two grand babies that I adore. No way would I want little kids at this stage. I’m loving the freedom having grown kids brings. I love being a young, healthy, active grandmother. To each his own. But for me, younger was perfect.[/quote] Omg, can’t imagine being a granny at 53....just no! Now when reach 70’s maybe.[/quote] My mom was 55 when I made her a grandmother and I'm grateful I started having kids when I did, given how actively helpful she was able to be for us, and especially since I lost my own grandparents in their early 70s. I'd still choose 40 over 20, but I would absolutely put the grandparent argument in the pro age 20 argument. Kids can have a longer relationship with younger and more physically active grandparents, and know them for longer before they pass away.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
