Reply to Blair math: functions

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Blair math: functions"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=pettifogger][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]1 had one kid take functions and one not take it. They areboth fine. It’s a very very very hard class.[/quote]
I'm getting confused here. Isn't true that Functions and Pre-Calculus cover the same stuff at different speed? Are you suggesting that Functions cover more in depth?[/quote]

There's another recent thread on this, it doesn't appear that there is any extra depth, just more acceleration. In that sense it would not be worth doing it over the other path unless kids can handle it without too much difficulty. In that case it would make sense in order to allow room for an extra semester of the fun upper level electives before graduation (e.g Complex Analysis, etc).[/quote]

There is more depth as well as acceleration. -- F(x)s mom[/quote]

~Another Functions mom[/quote]

According to Peter and the current functions teacher, there is only acceleration. As a functions parent, I know very well what DC is learning in the class, but have no way of knowing how the pre-calculus class goes, so I can't give first hand comparisons.
[/quote]

That was not my understanding from discussion w/ same teacher. Just from that discussion and the work I've seen, they seem to dig a little deeper. I know the official line is tat it's the same content, but it's the teacher that brings the additional depth.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics