Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Parenting Discussion
Reply to "What caused the shift in “quality parenting”?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The shift was caused by the number of children. When families typically had 3-4 or 6 or 8 kids, they were valuable collectively but less individually. Now families have 1 or 2 kids and each is very valuable, and therefore receives a larger parental investment of time, money, and other resources.[/quote] Kids were less valuable individually? That’s incredibly stupid thinking. Parents may have had less time for each kid individually, but they didn’t value them less. [/quote] I know a few families with a large # of kids (Catholics) and the youngest kids were definitely NOT valued. BIRTH CONTROL gave families the means to have fewer kids and value them more. [/quote] I actually think this is true. Every single person I've ever met from very large families (like 6 or more) said that older siblings were expected to raise the younger ones and everyone involved hated it.[/quote] Exactly. The older kids raised the younger kids. Older kids resented it and the younger kids resented not knowing their parents well at all. Parents only had that many kids because they didn’t use birth control. They didn’t plan that many kids. Or even want the last few (one kid was given away). This is true in for the 3 very large Catholic families I know (8+ kids). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics