Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "The Facts About the Districtwide Boundary Analysis"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The boundary decisions will be made in line with MCPS policy FAA, which the board approved recently, and which according to the RFP, the consultant should follow: https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/policy/pdf/faa.pdf Have a look at page 7, section G (2)(a): [quote] Analyses of options take into account the impact of various options on the overall populations of affected schools. Options should [b]especially[/b] strive to create a diverse student body in each of the affected schools in alignment with Board Policy ACD, Quality Integrated Education. [/quote] Emphasis mine. That word was added in at the last minute before they approved the policy (and there was some objection by a few board members -- it's in the minutes). Now.. why did they add that in? To me, that shows diversity trumps the other factors. [/quote] No, the word was not added in at the last minute. And diversity was already a factor. The only change was the addition of the word "especially". Why did they add it in? Presumably because they want the options to especially strive to create a diversre student body in each of the affected schools. Now, please explain how this relates to potential legal action related to the boundary analysis.[/quote] I don’t think it matters, but it was added as an amendment made after the revised policy was put out publicly for comments. So it’s a change that people did not have the opportunity to comment on before it was adopted. Whether one thinks that is “last minute” or somehow sneaky or nefarious, well, I don’t but you’re going to think what you’re going to think. I believe it was added because some individuals were very upset that in the RM ES #5 boundary study Twinbrook was left with a much higher FARMs Emirates than the other cluster ESs. It was not the Twinbrook community that was upset about it, it was other people in the system who didn’t think it should be ok for one ES in a cluster to have that much higher if a FARMs rate than the others.[/quote] Doesn’t matter? It does matter. A lot. Because we live in a democracy.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics