Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Where did your 33/34 ACT, 3.9 UW GPA get in?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]All the colleges, including Harvard, don't give a shit about the true purpose of affirmative action and their ethical and moral role in making it a success for the greater good of the society. They all want easy way out to check the box and tout the number admitted. They don't care if the student and the family are wealthy and recent immigrants from Africa or the student is from a wealthy, well educated, wellconnected black family. In fact, the colleges prefer it that way so that they don't need to provide academic support services, if needed by the true affirmative action admits. If the colleges really care about it, with their filthy rich tax-exempt endowments they would adopt some school districts in poor neighborhoods and promote Pre-K to 12 schooling and after-school enrichment and use those school districts as pipelines into their Freshman admissions and to show case them as models for success. The law should be changed for affirmative action to be available to children born only in the U.S. and parental income less than median income of U.S. households ($60K to $75K). There should be birth place and income verification before affirmative action admission is awarded. [/quote] Again: Its. Not. Affirmative. Action. And, for the record, Harvard and other elite colleges do consider family income when admitting, and the Harvard lawsuit showed being poor was an ADVANTAGE in admissions, particularly when coming off the waitlist (where the opposite is true at most colleges which have far smaller endowments).[/quote] I said[b] the law should be changed as to how Affirmative Action is defined[/b]. It should be restricted to a child born in the U.S. only (of the same races currently recognized as URM) and the household income should be no more than the U.S. median (currently between $65K and $75K). What does Harvard and other elite colleges considering family income when admitting have to do with what I am proposing. [b]Harvard and other elite colleges will be ashamed if they ever publish and reveal the true picture of their affirmative action admits in terms of family income and wealth,[/b] parental education and occupation, and student's birthplace. There colleges will not be able to ignore the wrath of true Social Justice Warriors (hopefully SJWs are not from privileged families).[/quote] [quote]"[b]Harvard and other elite colleges will be ashamed if they ever publish and reveal the true picture of their affirmative action admits in terms of family income and wealth,[/b]" [/quote] No they wouldn't because they do not have any "affirmative action admits". [/quote] Ivy affirmative action: first and foremost legacies and athletes. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics