Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "WaPo feature on bad economic outlook for colleges"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The article also mentioned Bucknell didn't meet their enrollment target.[/quote] That surprised me. It seems like a competitive school at least to me. Oberlin is surprising as well. It is a known school. I hate saying this, but I wonder if the social justice outrage of several years ago turned people off to certain schools. I think people are willing to bite the bullet for schools like Harvard and Yale, but not for Oberlin?[/quote] And yet Bucknell is not at all that kind of place. This is a yield miscalculation, nothing more. [/quote] No it’s d-bag school in the middle of nowhere that has hard time luring bros from the state school experience. Different vibe, same issue.[/quote] Wow, your kid was rejected from Bucknell? Sorry about that.[/quote] No one was rejected form Bucknell. That's the point. They couldn't even fill their freshman class. [/quote] You fail to understand statistics or yield. Learn to read a common data set and then get back to me. And my comment was about it being a “d-bag school” which is only something an idiot would say.[/quote] Yet the 2nd article says their students cross admit at state schools. When yield didn't come through, it was students who choose a cheaper state option. Bucknell is a good school, but it's remote, fratty, and drunken. Maybe, nothing wrong with that, but state schools can do it better for less.[/quote] I won't argue the value of state schools. The statement "No one was rejected form Bucknell" is stupid because their acceptance rate is below 30%, meaning that 70% were rejected. Simple facts and figures. Yes, it has a strong greek system, and many people don't care for that (like me). But if you think there is less drinking at State U than Bucknell you are probably drinking yourself.[/quote] The statement that everyone was admitted is farce, but where are they going to get an additional 100+ interested students next year, without loosening standards? I'm certainly not saying, state school is a way to avoid drinking and greek life, just that it's a more direct path, if that is the goal. State school is Bucknell's competition.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics