Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Cities with No Children"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous] [quote]You cannot build more housing without fixing the infrastructure and adopting it to handle more population. It's already at its very max, highways are in need or repair and much expansion, too many cars/trucks. Subways are overcrowded and cannot handle all the population needing to use them, even bike lanes and sidewalks are crowded. The electric grid is stressed, and the water/steam system and sewage needs constant maintenance. [/quote] Here in DC the metro is NOT at its max, it has not recovered its ridership from ten years ago. And we can build more bus only lanes to supplement, and if we had more population we could justify building more rail lines. Not only are bike lanes (other than 15th street) not crowded, but anti bike people complain they are under used. Most sidewalks could handle more people too. Sewage systems have huge costs to fix out dated combined sewer outflows. More housing means more people share that cost. In general dense cities can provide infrastructure much more cheaply than sprawling suburbs. And we need to rely less on autos. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics