Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "DOJ argues that migrant children should not receive toothbrushes or soap "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]“Judge William Fletcher, the third panel member, said Gee found evidence that minors were kept overnight in crowded, chilly rooms, sleeping on concrete floors with aluminum-foil blankets with the lights kept on all night.” One night? I think one night is acceptable. They went without soap, a toothbrush, a blanket how many nights while traveling to cross the border?[/quote] Their parents risked these kids lives—they can survive without toothpaste. Give me a break. [/quote] No one said they couldn't "survive" without toothpaste. It just seems cruel to not give kids something as simple as toothpaste for hygiene purposes. We give toothpaste to homeless people all the time. They've survived for months without it too. Doesn't mean we can't be kind and give them some.[/quote] +1 Let the chlidren come to me said Jesus....I didn't read anything where he said once they are there, treat them without respect for basic hygiene.[/quote] I think I missed the part where he said "Give them a toothbrush."[/quote] I’m not Christian but from what I’ve read, I think Jesus would have shared whatever he had with poor, frightened children. The GOP is showing theirhypocrisy.[/quote] The GOP isn't in charge of the purse strings right now, honey. Toothbrushes/soap/blankets don't appear out of thin air. Right your congress rep. [/quote] Well how about this: the government is required BY LAW to provide "safe and sanitary" conditions, which is why the Trump administration lawyers are in front of the 9th Circuit to begin with. Don't give me that mealy-mouthed shit about funding when Trump is running off to his Trump-owned properties to the tune of $100 million expense to the taxpayers.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics