Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Atlantic article on college admissions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Thank you 9:59. We've lost all perspective in this debate. Legacies, uber-wealthy buying their way in through side or back doors, faux-disabled (or exaggerated disabilities) people are a tiny, tiny fraction of the college population. The effects of the more mundane advantages are widespread and rarely questioned, perhaps because so many have them.[/quote] Ah, but the sanctity of the SN parents who says the extended time is a level playing field but it actually is not, it gave a leg up to those who got more time than they should have. Poster 9:59 was already on 2nd or 3rd base to afford all the testing and for his/her kid to go to a good school system. It is okay then then to have an advantage of the kid in the poorer neighborhoods, immigrants etc? The “as long as my kid benefit club”....[/quote] Proving the point. You are focusing on one SN parent (an obnoxious one at that) and ignoring the half dozen on this thread who shared that their kids not to use them for one reason or other. -SN parent who explained my kid getting accommodations in MS and 9th grade and letting them go for SATa. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics