Reply to BOE Memer is proposing to study school boundary in MCPS

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "BOE Memer is proposing to study school boundary in MCPS"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Honestly -- I think they need to at least consider this option.  Some schools are massively overcrowded while other are under-utilized.  Why build new schools when they could potentially solve the problem with redistricting. Isn't that a more cost effective solution?[/quote]

Where is MCPS building a new school where they could solve the problem with boundary changes? Could you provide one specific example, please?[/quote]

I didn't mean just a brand new school building but all the additions, etc.  New building in general.[/quote]

Ok, where?[/quote]

Look at the long range planning document -- many schools over the years have gotten additions including ours. (Diamond ES)[/quote]

New high school in Crown, complete destruction of SVHS to make way for a new SVHS which will increase capacity by over 1,000 students. [/quote]

And what boundary changes would you have proposed, that would have provided the capacity without building a new high school at Crown and a bigger building at Seneca Valley High School?

Keeping in mind that both the high school at Crown and the bigger building at Seneca Valley High School are themselves based on boundary changes to provide capacity.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics