Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Where the heck are the Republicans?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]How these payment influence the election? All trumpeters knew about pussy grabbing and golden rain, and didn't give a s... Who exactly was influenced by one more affair?[/quote] Why ’d they cover it up if they thought it wouldn’t hurt?[/quote] [/b] Actually this is the crux. It’s a good question. It proves the intent was to influence the election. Honestly I commiserate with ppp, because my mom-legal mind thinks: -influence the election? What candidate isn’t trying to influence or change the voters minds in an election (seriously..like I am in kindergarten, please explain) -I keep going around in circles about if trump ordered it and paid for it across the 11 invoices...isn’t that not a campaign contribution by Cohen? That’s just contracting out work/taking a loan from Cohen and paying it back. In fact he paid Cohen more. Lol, I’m literally not excusing trump. I just don’t jump as fast as you DC lawyers. Was trying to explain to nonpoltical DH. [/quote] Can anyone answer these legal questions?[/quote] Um, Cohen answered them by pleading guilty.[/quote] And Kellyanne’s husband answers them here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2018/12/14/trumps-claim-that-he-didnt-violate-campaign-finance-law-is-weak-dangerous/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.ccb335fb93b9[/quote] Thank you! Finally... I think people thought i was questioning the illegality, but in fact I just wanted to understand what’s going on. My takeaway from that article: is everyone going to be scouring old Meet the Press episodes for conservative commentary on the Edwards case? Remember before “there’s a tweet for that.”? Right on, Conway.[/quote] There is a tweet for that! Here’s Trump himself in the Edwards case. https://twitter.com/rgoodlaw/status/1073617404805177344?s=21[/quote] Well at least he took the stance (for his own a$$ covering) that it was a waste of a trial. To think he knew back then of the threat of this kind of thing happening to him.... Gretchen’s comments were spot on. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics