Reply to TPMS MAP-M scores

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "TPMS MAP-M scores"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]This is a shortcoming of MAP, although NWEA doesn’t look at it that way. You should remember MAP was designed to measure progress and identify students who aren’t meeting benchmarks.

It was never intended for finding students eligible for access to higher level math or gifted programs. And if it’s used for such the data only works when a lower cut off score is applied around 90%.

As far moving from 2-5 to 6+. It is not so much the increased difficulty of questions in 6+ that causes a dip, but the *lack* difficult questions in 2-5. High achieving kids with focus can score high on 2-5 just by answering arithmetic problems with high accuracy.  There are questions drawn from 6th and 7th grade, but a student does not necessarily need to answer these to get a score in the 99%. If they do they score jumps up, perhaps artificially so. The closer a student is to the ceiling of a test the less accurate the score.

The 6+ includes content from 3rd grade through high school algebra and geometry. Disclaimer: MAP is a norm-referenced assessment. It’s not a criterion-referenced assessment. That means you cannot use it to assess a child’s grade level. You cannot determine your 6th grader is *at* a ninth grade level from this test.

Bottom line: MAP is almost meaningless for kid in the top percentiles. It’s not designed for them. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics