Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Photographer only offering digital files at extremely high price"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’ll be the outlier. I’m surprised you don’t get the digital file of any picture you bought a print of. I’ve never heard of that before.[/quote] I hire photographers - THIS IS HOW IT WORKS. [/quote] I feel like the photographers on this thread are upset that business is having trouble and frustrated that this is the direction people are going and that it is upsetting that a lot of people feel this way. Be upset at modern technology not people who can't afford to pay thousands of dollars for family photos on the regular. That is just cost prohibitive to most families. [/quote] In demand photogs charge a LOT. They just do. And they are worth it. Which is why they are in demand. You are free to take them yourself or to go to some sub-par photographer or to your hobbyist friend to take them. That may be good enough for you. And that's fine. But this is their livelihood and they are good at it. They charge what the market will permit. Someone is buying from them. They need not accept less just b/c you can't or don't want to pay their prices. Done.[/quote] Ok. I just think if you're donating something and you know you are at the top of the price range you should be transparent up front. [/quote] I’m not a photographer, but I’ve been defending photogs on this thread. It’s a lot of work, it’s intellectual property. If you want it for free, go to the Walmart photo area. I’m guessing most people here can “afford” a real photographer, and their cleaned up images, but what they want is the starving artist type, who will give their art up for free. [/quote] So what I take umbrage with with you is that I (OP) have literally not once said i wanted anything for free. My proposal was that there should be a fee tacked on to the purchase of a print to acquire the digital image, that is not free. I dont want anyone to starve and I just refuse to accept that spending 2k on family photos and questioning it makes me cheap. A very small percentage of the population can drop 2k on family photos once let alone regularly. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics