Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Freedman can write a much better complaint after getting the benefit of seeing the judge’s decision to the motions to dismiss, so I understand why he wants to wait for that.  The judge is really behind on issuing his decision, which isn’t necessarily surprising, given that criminal cases and emergency motions are a higher priority.  I just don’t think the motion for sanctions is going to do anything other than annoy the judge.  It’s completely duplicative of the mtd arguments and is therefore just “clutter” that he already indicated he doesn’t like.
[/quote]

Why do you think the judge is behind? It took him a year to rule on the Bravo MTD. I think everyone just needs to accept that it’s going to be a while before we hear anything on the MTDs. He may even decide to call a hearing before ruling.[/quote]

Because most judges try to decide these motions quickly so that the parties can proceed with discovery knowing which  claims survive and which need to be replied.  Google says average time to decision on motion to dismiss in federal court ranges from 22 to 116 days, which is consistent with my experience as a litigator.  [/quote]

Just did the same search and it said 22 to “over” 116 days. I think the bravo case is a good comparison. Liman is the judge, it’s a Hollywood feud, and one of the claims is hostile work environment. Bravo filed their MTD last May. The hearing was in November and the ruling wasn’t until March…[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics