Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]All of this rationalizing by the Baldoni supporters about how things will turn out just fine for Freedman. Eh. One think I will say is that Liman specifically warned Freedman, several times, that he should amend his complaint. Freedman explicitly ignored him. He was warned his timeline didn't comport with the federal rules, and Freedman ignored him. One thing I will say is that Baldoni supporting lawyers here have previously argued that federal judges regularly allow liberal leave to amend and that Baldoni should expect the same in this case. I don't think no nonsense Liman is going to play here, and I noted earlier that Second Circuit precedent that Lively cited in the sanctions motion explaining that Liman certainly can dismiss with prejudice where parties have previously been warned to amend and failed to do so. Liman is running a tight ship and Freedman has basically ignored all of these warnings at his own (well, really his clients') peril. Claims are going to get dismissed and they are not coming back.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics