Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]As scintillating as "you're a bot!" "no, you're a bot!" is...

Not sure if this is really the move for Lively. Liman seemed pissed at Freedman last week, where you could see how this was the best time to possibly get sanctions if you're ever going to try... OTOH, this is also producing more of the pointless bickering that Liman was pissed about, so I am not sure that they are doing themselves a great favor. It's basically another MTD which is what Wayfarer's attorneys argued in their letter response (it's the last exhibit). 
[/quote]

This is what I think, the judge was annoyed with Freedman last week, and now Gottlieb et al are wasting their momentary advantage by going  out of their way to annoy the judge with an unnecessary motion.  Rule 11 sanctions are an extraordinary remedy, not something regularly assessed on the losing party of amotion to dismiss.  Furthermore, the motion to dismiss hasn’t even been decided, and frankly, this can be interpreted as a bit of a swipe at the judge for not yet issuing a decision.  I think it’s a tactical mistake by the Lively attorneys.[/quote]

PP, and I was thinking that too that they're nudging the judge for a decision which will not be taken well.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics