Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I haven't been involved in many sanctions motions and while I support Lively I'm a little skeptical that she will win on them here. That said, what I *love* about this motion is that it basically forces Freedman to provide her with some of the substantive info that she is looking for on Baldoni's most tenuous claims, since he would not do the normal thing and amend his complaint. Whether or not they lose the sanctions motion, they tee up the issue of these claims having no real basis and if Freedman has real facts to support them, he should provide them now. Also enjoyed the Second Circuit precedent saying that courts should be more likely to dismiss claims with prejudice where claimants have been provided the opportunity to amend before motions to dismiss and declined those opportunities, similar to Freedman's actions (or lack of action) here.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
