Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Lively Motion for Sanctions just dropped, it's so beautiful:  https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.223.0.pdf

"Every lawyer certifies under Rule 11 that the pleadings they file with the court are not “frivolous, legally unreasonable, or factually without foundation,” and are “not being presented for any improper purposes, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation.” Failing to meet these standards subjects both lawyers and their clients to sanctions. The Rule 11 Plaintiffs and their Counsel have violated Rule 11 in every respect.

"As to an improper purpose, that the FAC was filed principally as a vehicle to seed harassing media narratives against Ms. Lively is obvious. The examples are legion – from its legally meaningless 178-page “Exhibit A,” to Counsel’s ghoulish taunt that Ms. Lively should testify about her degrading experience of sexual harassment at Madison Square Garden before 20,000 spectators and streamed for the world, to using the Court’s docket to level baseless allegations of extortion and spoliation of evidence against Ms. Lively and her counsel." [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics