Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Has Venable mooted their motion to quash in DC? Genuinely asking, I can't remember if someone linked that docket. Freedman said they would moot it because he was working with them "in good faith" now. I think it's weird they have not yet if that's the case. If they don't moot it, Wayfarer will owe a response on that docket soon.[/quote]

They have 14 days.[/quote]

But why hasn't Venable mooted their motion altogether? Freedman shouldn't have to file a response at all if he and Venable are now working towards production as Freedman claimed.

Did Freedman lie in his letter about Venable's intentions? That could explain why Liman came down so hard on Freedman in granting the motion to strike and even included a paragraph telling the press to give letters like Freedman even less credence than you would give a statement made out of court, which I thought was kind of overboard.

I wonder if Liman conferred with the judge in the DC case or received any communication from Venable indicating that Freedman was lying about Venable's intentions. Because he said they were going to moot their motion and they haven't.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics