Reply to Taylor's Feb Rec for Crown Boundary Study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Taylor's Feb Rec for Crown Boundary Study"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wow Dufief, now I get the hate.
First it was calling people personally out by name and now it’s saying their kids are losers.

Fantastic examples of level-headed community advocacy. Keep up the great work. You all look wonderful in the community. A+![/quote]

The poster literally said they aren't in the Wootton cluster? Reading comprehension. But you're clearly not very smart. [/quote]

lol his comment came a minute before. Can’t exactly read a comment that didn’t exist when I was responding.

But keep going with your name calling! You and the poster—who is a teacher that enjoys calling kids losers—would make such great friends.

Stay classy Dufief & friends.[/quote]

Not Dufief. Try again. [/quote]

Reading comprehension back at ya 😉 
It’s Dufief & friends

But again love the doubling down for you.
“No I refuse to stay classy. I will continue to call minor children losers. I teach kids. It’s my right to call them losers.”[/quote]

Are you parkway people really so self-absorbed that you can't imagine other parts of the county might take issue with what you are doing? [/quote]

You can be from anywhere. I draw the line at adults— a teacher no less—name calling kids.

I don’t care where you stand on the boundary study. [/quote]

I'm not the one who said that about the kids. And you're right- I could be from anywhere. So why is saying I must be from Dufief the default when I say something you disagree with? It's really weird. [/quote]

Because they are grasping at straws.

First it was immediate legal threats.

Then it was threatening to vote out board members and politicians who didn't bow to them.

Then it was utilizing Magruder's more seriously problematic position as a front for their own interests.

Now that all those failed we're back to litigiousness and lashing out at specific communities to avoid what they don't want to occur.  Nothing has stuck so far, so here's their Hail Mary. [/quote]

Don't forget the brief moment where they were claiming issues of linguistic/cultural access despite the fact that relevant documents were circulated in Chinese and Vietnamese, and despite the fact that somehow the majority of survey responses came in English from the same GS-15 scientists they were claiming didn't speak English well enough to engage in the process. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics