Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Barr Installs Outside Prosecutor to Review Case Against Michael Flynn, Ex-Trump Adviser"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Powers claimed she never tried to unmask Flynn; records show she unmasked him 7 times. Why lie? Comey admitted he took advantage of what he called a "disorganized" transition by conducting a criminal interview with Flynn, but didn't tell him as they were required. Why do this? Both agents said they believed Flynn was truthful. The judge admits that documents are missing and said 'it happens'. All here defending Sullivan want to gloss over that point. Flynn's former defense withheld paperwork from his new defense. Why? The prosecutors also withheld paperwork from the defense. Why? If you have a ton of information proving Flynn is a 'traitor', why settle for one charge of lying to the FBI? After all, you have proof of him being a traitor which is far worse, right?? Why is the Kisliak call important? Because on 12/29/2016, Flynn was vacationing in the DR where calls were not secure, and where they are out of US jurisdiction (i.e. no need to request unmasking - they can just get the transcript and recording of the call. Then Flynns name is leaked to Ignatius at the WaPo, whic is a crime.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics