Reply to new Reade/Biden thread

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "new Reade/Biden thread"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

On Twitter there’s a [b]screen shot of the charge against her,[/b] the dates match up and the crime code is for fraud. Now a screen shot isn’t evidence, I agree. But apparently several reporters are investigating. So stay tuned, I guess. [/quote]

Are the charges against her, or just a Tara Reade?[/quote]

Just against Tara Reade for check fraud committed by Reade only. [/quote]

But how do you know it’s THE Tara Reade? Is there only one in the USA?

There are 600 people named Ronald Reagan in the USA, should I assume the ex president got a speeding ticket in Ohio because I saw that name on a court case?[/quote]
You think there was more than one Tara Reade in San Luis Obispo County, CA in 1993? Her address is I’m sure part of the court record.
[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EXd64XaXgAAYQDi?format=jpg&name=900x900[/img][/quote]

I have no idea if there were 1 or 10 people with that name in CA in 1993. That screen shot does not show an address.

There are 2 Ronald Reagan’s currently in Damascus. Can you tell me which one ran the stop sign based on the court record?[/quote]
You missed me saying that I’m sure there’s an address somewhere in the court record.[/quote]

Everything quoted above is about "a screen shot of the charges against her" all I asked was based on that screenshot how do we know it is in fact her and not someone with the same name? We don’t have the court records, we have a screenshot with no address or even a middle initial. [/quote]

Ok, I spent about 40 minutes last night hunting for information to corroborate this tweet.  I could not find any, and I'm pretty good at Google Fu.  The only thing is a reddit thread that has been redacted and edited to ask for corroboration or confirmation of the person who posted the original snapshot and there is no answer.  @FliedGaff is the Twitter handle of the person who initially posted the photo.

So, at this point, it seems that neither the Twitter person who initially posted the clip nor any of the people on Twitter who reposted the clip can confirm the source of this clip or the authenticity.  The SLO court records are not searchable on-line so this is not confirmed, nor should it be used as evidence against her until it is corroborated by someone and the source confirmed.[/quote]

That Reddit also says the WaPo is on it. So we shall see. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics