Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SCOTUS outlaws race as college admissions factor"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]That has never been true. POC who were QUALIFIED were admitted, it was never about admitting unqualified students. That a racist lie straight from hell![/quote] If they were qualified, they wouldn't have needed affirmative action to admit them.[/quote] The whole issue is because there are a lot more students who meet the qualifications for Harvard and would likely to do well at Harvard, than the available slots at Harvard. The underlying issue is that Harvard is ridiculously overvalued by parents whose genius kids would be just as successful with degrees from any of 100 other excellent universities. [/quote] Then they should admit the qualified applicants by lottery. Seems a bit more fair IMO. [/quote] They like to create a class that is not too lopsided, that has just the right ration of engineers and art majors, athletes and musicians, city residents and rural dwellers, and students from all 50 states. You can't get that from a lottery.[/quote] Why should we be ok with such social engineering? Isn’t that so very Machiavellian? Why would society incest that much power in such a small unelected group?[/quote] These are private institutions. No one is forcing you to apply there. [/quote] Private yes, but take substantial government funding in various forms, which means Federal laws applies. Only one college doesn't take government funding and that is Hillsdale. Harvard could try to go down this path but it means giving up billions in Federal funding as well as access to Federal grants for research and loans for students. I do wonder what the implications are for contracting set asides for minority owned businesses. I suspect it's just a matter of time. But on the other hand, most "minority owned" businesses in Federal contracting are owned by Asians and South Asians so that's probably why there's little noise in defending those set asides. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics