Reply to Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/01/democrats-pakistani-background-checks/

Links to other stories are in the article and listed below.  Almost every story has specific documentation.  There is a lot to this.[/quote]

The guy first went to work for Robert Wexler.  He is the one who should have done the background check, but since he is no longer in Congress, he is not part of the 44 members DC is going on about.

Naturally Daily Caller did not mention that they omitted the one person who should actually have done the background check.  Liars figuring.
[/quote]

Why would you think that only the first guy should have done a background check? If I’m hiring a nanny, I’m not going to just assume the nanny’s last employer made sure her background check was okay. I’m also not going to hire more of the nanny’s relatives on the assumption that their backgrounds must be fine.

Responsible people do their due diligence. If you haven’t learned this yet in your life, you really should now.

[/quote]
Because it's the same employer.  The better analogy is whether companies do new background checks when an employee moves to a different department.[/quote]

But no one did the background checks! In your analogy, none of the departments would have done the background checks - not the first one, not the second one.

What is it going to take for you to understand that the background checks weren’t done? Seriously. [/quote]

Actually the article did not say that.  It said that none of the 44 current ones did.  They conveniently left out former members, including the one who first hired him.  This is how liars figure.  They write a big long story with lots of detail but leave out the obvious, hoping you will not notice.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics