Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What Livrly supporters don’t quite get is that Blake’s reputation is toast. Yesterday was devastating for her and her case. Even if she wins down the road, all trust in her has disappeared. So many red flags were there from the beginning.

Baldoni will actually be okay, or better than okay. Everyone sees exactly who Blake is and will give him another shot, more projects and work going forward. If he loses the case, I wouldn’t blame it on him having a weak case, but instead point to power and influence winning the day, as it often does.
[/quote]

Lively doesn’t have real supporters. Nobody has cared about her since she was Harvey’s girl and he had her linked up with the top fashion houses. But that was like 15 years ago. She’s a D list actress who only still has a career because of her husband.[/quote]

Go on believing that.

Lively managed to get enough people to go see IEWU that it well outpaced expectations in terms of box office. She continues to get major Hollywood support from Ari Emanuel, Sony, Paul Feig, people like Hugh Jackman, Emily Blunt, Sean Levy, and Stanley Tucci. These are not D-listers. Salma Hayek shows her support by doing a pap walk with Lively earlier this week after what was obviously a planned lunch -- Salma's husband is a billionaire who owns CAA, a very influential agency. She continues to be dressed by top designers and get her picture in Vogue, WWD, and other top magazines. She and RR continue to be considered A-list in the industry (meaning they can open a movie) even if right now that comes with an asterisk because of the lawsuits. But they are FAR from abandoned.

And there are authentic, real people who believe Blake and support her lawsuit. She has both committed supporters on threads like this or on Reddit (the r/BaldoniFiles sub has a little over 4.5k members) as well as passive supporters who aren't paying close attention but generally take her side (see the Taylor Swift subs that have leaned toward Lively throughout all of this, as well as the big pop culture subs like r/fauxmois and r/popculturechat, where the majority of commenters take her side, even if more casually than you see on the dedicated thread). And then you have the rest of the public. Some no doubt think she sucks and assume she's lying. But many still don't even know who Baldoni is. They might not sit around thinking about her allegations or investing in believing her, but they are passive and don't care enough to find out exactly what this story is about or to hate her. Why does that matter? Because Lively is massively more famous than Baldoni, and at the end of the day, if people are oblivious to the lawsuit story but generally have a good impression of Lively for other reasons, they will continue to have a good impression of her unless something happens to change that.

Whereas Baldoni's entire reputation is based on this one issue. It's the only thing most people know him for.[/quote]

There are tons of real Blake fans!

*vomits another 500 words for the literal thousandth time in this thread*

I think you’re her only fan, sweetie. Bless your heart.[/quote]

Dp. Honestly a lot of her ‘supporters’ on the taylor sub looked suspicious to me. And to others on that sub [/quote]

I though the idea of untraceable reddit campaigns was preposterous and fantastical? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics