Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Motion to Quash isn't mooted yet somehow, i thought freedman said that was a'coming.[/quote]

Let’s say it doesn’t come. And? [/quote]

That means Venable is still fighting the subpoena and isn't working with Freedman as he claimed. It means both that he's lying and that Taylor's camp knows it.[/quote]

Why does it mean he’s lying? About the reasons he’s seeking a subpoena?

If he’s lying, why isn’t TS making a statement? [/quote]

He’s not lying. Gottlieb all but confirmed it with that coded statement he made to People that the conversation didn’t happen “as described”.[/quote]

This is code for "I talked to Baldridge but it didn't happen that way." There's nothing wrong with him talking to Baldridge (Taylor's lawyer). I'm sure they were in touch over a variety of matters, including the PO Lively sought (and got) to protect people like Taylor in the event she was drawn into discovery. Gottlieb may have asked if Taylor would be willing to put out a statement. But Gottlieb has firmly denied that he tried to extort anyone, and it would honestly be psychotic for him to try to extort TS through Baldridge (also at all but especially bad to do it to another lawyer who could, of course, report the ethics violation).

It's a preposterous story.[/quote]

Ok so let’s see the communication that was exchanged. FYI these communications are not privileged unless there was a joint defense or similar. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics