Reply to Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t think they should settle when that means paying Baldoni money. Isn’t most of his case going to vanish with the motions to dismiss, whereas none of hers is even really challenged?  I think if they are able to get bad facts out about the actual bad actions take. By the PR team etc then people will start to see their side more. That was her reason for filing the suit in the first place, so let’s see what’s in the discovery.

If they do settle once discovery rolls in, maybe that signals to me that discovery resulted in a nothingburger.  [/quote]

What MTD? [/quote]

Most of Baldoni’s claims against Lively have been challenged by the parties in motions to dismiss. Freedman just fought over coughing up various financials for his clients and lost except in terms of tax returns mostly.  The fact that he fought these doc requests could also be signaling they can’t really show $400M in lost profits.  Baldoni alone made $50M in profits off the movie and frankly doesn’t ever have to work again. If a lot of his claims get dismissed and the damages he is claiming go down, not sure there is a reason to settle unless Sarowitz is going to fork over a bunch of cash to Lively. [/quote]

Lol. Those MTD weren’t granted. Tiny difference, no? [/quote]

Are you new here?  The MTDs challenging most or all of Baldoni’s claims (and Lively’s claims against Jed Wallace) are briefed but not yet decided. Only bad things can happen there for Baldoni by his claims being thrown out. None of Lively’s are challenged besides Wallace. The judge has already signaled that there is a good chance Baldoni’s claims against deep pockets NYT will be dismissed. [/quote]

You’re silly and trying to spin.

Not new. Just bc someone files a MTD doesn’t mean it will be granted. lol. Baldoni likely didn’t challenge her claims for strategic purposes, not bc they’re at all legit.

The NYT case is separate from livelys. That case could be thrown out and the one against her will survive. But I think the NYT case will survive in some form. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics