Reply to Common Core's epic fail: Special Education

Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion

Reply to "Common Core's epic fail: Special Education"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]
Of course the process affects the products. It is likely that if the process was bad, then the product is bad. It's not certain though -- a bad process can result in a good product. And a good process can result in a bad product. In any case, if the process was bad here, and it resulted in a bad product, then it should be easy to produce examples of that bad product. And yet all I keep reading are the same complaints about process. Why? [/quote]

You must be new on this thread.  Go back and read.  Some poorly written standards are posted.  Many are vague and some are inappropriate developmentally.
 
[/quote]

There were two standards posted, both kindergarten standards. The objection to one of them was quibbling. The objection to the other one was either that it was unclear, or alternatively that it wasn't unclear but it was developmentally inappropriate, as determined by somebody with no professional expertise in kindergarten.

But please do post more standards that you consider poorly-written!

How about this fifth-grade standard, for example. Is it bad? Is it developmentally inappropriate?

CCSS.Math.Content.5.NBT.B.5
Fluently multiply multi-digit whole numbers using the standard algorithm.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics