Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Private & Independent Schools
Reply to "Article on Falsely Accused Washington Hebrew Congregation Preschool Teacher"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I can understand the want to try and clear one’s name publicly, however, I have a feeling this is just going to cause JS more legal trouble. He was subpoenaed to give a deposition for the civil case. I looked on the court website for this case. A court order dated 3/16/22 states, “ORDERED that Mr. Silverman is precluded from disclosing the identities, or any information that would lead to the disclosure of the identities, of the plaintiffs in these consolidated cases. Judge Alfred S. Irving, Jr.” While the article gives pseudonyms, the reporter expressly states Mr. Silverman was his source. That he (the reporter) saw and received communications from Silverman about those involved in the civil case. And the reporter included that the reporting was going on while the civil case was still active. (Though typically a HIPPA/Protective order doesn’t expire just because a case ends). Giving this level of detail to a third party (the reporter) about a case involving minors, with a HIPPA/protective order, seems like a very ill informed decision. I knew exactly who ‘Robert & Alison’ were from reading this article. As I think anyone who had children at the school at the time could also easily figure it out. [/quote] Legally, your argument doesn't have a leg to stand on. Thank goodness for JS. [/quote] Okay. Not my case. Not my children. You seem very invested. Maybe do something positive with these feelings. I hear there is a gofundme if you feel this strongly. I, on the other hand, think maybe less identifiable details should have been given. Because ultimately these details identify the child, ‘Jenny.’ We disagree. And that’s fine. People disagree about things. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics