Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Jobs that AI won’t replace?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Nurse [/quote] LOL, wrong. I'm a nurse and you can bet that AI is happening in nursing[/quote] Yet you give no examples of how AI is replacing nurses... AI might[b] supplement[/b] what a nurse does [b]but it won't replace[/b] a nurse. [/quote] Obviously. This is what most people here don't seem to understand. M[b]achinery didn't replace slavery/sharecroppers, it just made it where fewer were needed for any given situation[/b]. So while A.I. won't completely replace most fields, it WILL replace about 95% of the jobs in an average field that will benefit from the A.I. and robotics. A current example are fast food places replacing someone at a register, with a robot kiosk. There will still be a manager to attend to kiosk/customer troubles, but now there are several less workers needed to tend the front counter. [/quote] yoooooooooo.....this is not correct....at all[/quote] The cotton gin caused the number of enslaved people to increase — and here’s why, very clearly: The cotton gin (invented by Eli Whitney in 1793) made it much faster and easier to separate cotton fibers from seeds, especially with short-staple cotton, which could be grown across much more of the American South. Before the cotton gin, cotton processing was so slow and labor-intensive that large-scale cotton farming wasn't practical in many regions. After the cotton gin, cotton quickly became highly profitable. Planters expanded cotton cultivation massively across the Deep South (Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, etc.). Even though the gin reduced labor needed to clean cotton, it dramatically increased the demand for labor to plant, cultivate, and harvest the cotton fields — which led directly to an increase in the demand for enslaved labor. By 1860, cotton accounted for nearly 60% of U.S. exports, and the number of enslaved people in the South had exploded from about 700,000 in 1790 to nearly 4 million.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics