Reply to Please explain this newest e-mail controversy / Weiner / Huma thing

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Please explain this newest e-mail controversy / Weiner / Huma thing"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I don’t know that you will get any nonpartisan responses here, OP, but I will give it a shot and attempt to be objective.

Back in July, Comey announced that no indictment would be sought against Hillary for anything she had done WRT the server/email/etc.  He was then called to Congress to testify about the decision he made because Congress felt that there was ample evidence to issue an indictment or convene a Grand Jury.  At least the Republican members felt this way.  
At that time, he indicated that the investigation into Clinton’s server was essentially complete and that nothing more would be done unless and until other evidence was presented that warranted further investigation.

On Friday, he announced that new evidence has been presented.  We later found out that this was found while the FBI was investigating the Weiner sexting case.  Because of this new evidence, he informed Congress that he needed to amend his previous testimony and that the FBI would be investigating this new evidence which appeared to have a connection to the Clinton email case.

There has been a lot of speculation about what is in the emails that have since been discovered.  A lot of speculation.  What we have heard is that there are thousands of emails.  
Since nobody knows what exactly is in the emails, these questions have arisen:

1.  Could these be some of the emails that Hillary deleted before turning over the emails to State?
2.  Who is the author of these emails.... Hillary?  Huma?  Weiner?
3.  Is there any classified information in these emails?
4.  Is there any other incriminating information in these emails (Clinton Foundation, for example)?
5.  Are these emails purely personal?
6.  Does the FBI know the content of these emails enough to have sent a letter to Congress to begin with?
7.  Are these emails duplicates of what the FBI has already seen?  
8.  How did these emails get on a computer that reportedly belonged to Weiner?
9.  Was Weiner privy to classified information when he did not have a clearance to view classified information?

None of these questions have been answered.  And, because they haven’t, people are speculating.
I think that is it in a nutshell, but I am sure others will fill in information I omitted.  
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics