Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Royal take down of charters"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Actually DC charter schools are anomalous, there have been several stories on NPR and similar as well as some academic studies as to why charters seem to be failing in nearby Baltimore etc. . and are successful in DC. DC is a very different place to most cities- the middle class, the fed gov, the fact that we have no fed representation. even the population is different b/c of the fed jobs and NGOs, tons of international families. We also have an unusual amount of highly educated people who are paid very little. Part son the city are very wealthy and always have been while parts are gentrifying which is more typical of southern cities but then there is the immense amount of ethnic/linguistic diversity which is more like northern or Californian cities. MD, a highly wealthy state plus NOVA another highly wealthy area abut it and over power DC in a way that the states near other cities do not.. . Charters in DC seem to be working pretty well but the gentrification of DC has only begun, The sky rocketing housing is catching up to what it should've been in the first place- [b]it is stupid that a rowhous on Capitol Hill used to sell for under 500 k- that is artificially low b/c of how awful DC was, its normal for those lovely homes to be near a million. Thats how much they[i] should [/i]cost if DC hadn't been a burnt out hellhole which is what it was for most of the past century. [/b] [/quote] That's a relic of the graft, corruption, and incompetence of the Barry years. As a DC resident, I do not support voting rights: we're collectively too stupid to be entrusted with anything important. Instead, (because No Taxation Without Representation) we shouldn't have to pay federal income tax. That would make DC a magnet for people who are smart with their money. Then maybe 10 years from now it would be worth re-considering our voting rights. For the time being, we have too many people who would elect anybody by the name of Barry, Clinton, or Mayor Bowwow. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics