Reply to Decreased ovarian reserve vs. age-related infertility

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "Decreased ovarian reserve vs. age-related infertility"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So if you have low quantity, how does this affect pregnancy rates?  If you ovulate every month, don't you still have a reasonable chance of pregnancy?  Doesn't DOR just mean you will run out of eggs faster and go into menopause sooner?  But it seems that having DOR usually means a difficult time getting pregnant, can someone explain why?[/quote]

From what I've read, lower quantity correlates with lower quality, because the good eggs were likely to already have been used up. [/quote]

i don't think the best eggs are used first. it's just that eggs used earlier are by definition younger so less likely to have been corrupted.[/quote]

After I had two early miscarriages that were likely chromosomal, Dr. Frank. of gw mentioned my body was mistakenly sending bad eggs before good ones. He was right in that when I ended up doing Pgs about half my eggs were normal.  So I understood from him the body is supposed to know to send the best eggs first somehow, and it's not totally random. [/quote]

This sounds like a crock honestly. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics