Reply to The Choice Study report recommendation 3a

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "The Choice Study report recommendation 3a"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Oh gosh here we go again![/quote]
Yep.

The report says this:
[quote]...focus these programs on selecting equitably from among those applicants that demonstrate a capacity to thrive in the program, that include use of non-cognitive criteria, group-specific norms that benchmark student performance against school peers with comparable backgrounds...[/quote]

They cite a papere:
Peters, Scott, J. & Gentry, Marcia (2012). Group-Specific Norms and Teacher-Rating Scales: Implications for
Underrepresentation. Journal of Advanced Academics 23(2), 125-144.
[url]http://geri.education.purdue.edu/PDF%20Files/GENTRY/PetersGentry12.pdf[/url]

Rather than rebooting the conversation and making assumptions, why not discuss the paper?  At least that's a concrete starting point and better than jumping to conclusions about what MCPS may or may not propose based on this one sub-recomendation.
[/quote]

This paper is ridiculous. It shows that if you lower the standard for the underrepresented group, they are more likely to be identified as gifted. Just because it is dressed up in a What is the goal here? You either want to identify the kids who are gifted and needs an appropriate education at their level, or you just want to be able to say the gifted program has a racial composition that is proportional to the student population? I don't think proportional representation should be a goal in itself. Nurture the gifted minority kids early so that they can be be equally prepared for the magnet tests. But don't lower the standard for the program--that helps no one.  [/quote]

Well the authors also state:

"However, placing both groups of students, those
who meet the general group and those who meet the group-specific norms, in a typical
gifted program is [b]unlikely to provide the services needed for many students[/b]. Instead,
multiple levels of service must be applied to allow for all students to grow and develop
within the various content areas."

Therefore, the authors would agree that this method would identify more students but the quote above implies that lowering the standards and putting both groups in the same classroom would not benefit either group. What would their solution look like in MCPS--multiple levels of service?
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics