Reply to SART Data -SG vs Columbia

Forum Index » Infertility Support and Discussion

Reply to "SART Data -SG vs Columbia"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I kind of left SG and got better results. What happened was that after 3 cycles in the shared risk program I moved out of DC. In my new city(overseas) i decided to try out a local clinic, and it worked! They changed the protocol and I was pregnant twice with them, but miscarried both times. I never dropped out of the shared risk program though, because like the PP said, as much as SG really frustrated and disappointed me, I'll go back to the shared risk program if I have to. Plus I'll be able to go back with a record of success so I think my doctor would be willing to tweak the protocol at SG based on that alone.

PS--I actually did my first cycle at CFA, but not with Abbasi. There are pros and cons to any place. One of the up sides to SG and downsides to CFA is that at CFA your nurse won't be as organized, won't share a lot of detail unless you ask, and the routine is not as well managed. So on the callbacks my nurse at CFA would often just say 'everything is fine' and hangup quickly rather than telling me my actual E2 lab results. Or, on my cycle at CFA, which was my first, I never received a calendar so I didn't have a great sense of what might happen when (now I"m an old pro). Ultimately those things won't get you pregnant, they just impact stress level. Anyways, pros and cons. Do whatever you have to do to make it work![/quote]

A note on CFA--like SG the office where you cycle makes a difference. CFA downtown is a mess but if you cycle in Bethesda, the nurses are great and you will get a calendar and phone calls with details. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics