Reply to David Brock's Pathetic Spin on Hillary

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "David Brock's Pathetic Spin on Hillary"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes, he definitely switched.  I knew him when he was writing "The Real Anita Hill".  He then disappeared from sight going into a deep depression, then came out with a vulgar (he was almost naked on the front of Esquire with arrows sticking into him like St. Sebastian) piece in Esquire, which pretty much ruined him with the conservatives.  He's floundered about since then and has been discredited.  It's actually a very sad story.  http://www.wikiwand.com/en/David_Brock.[/quote]

[b]Why isn't he excommunicated from Clinton world then? Or at least discouraged? One would think Bill could tamp it down if he really didn't approve.

Have "Karl Rove or Dick Cheney tactics" ever been uttered from HRC's lips? Seems a bit hypocritical, don't you think?

You'd probably have to "suspend disbelief" now wouldn't you.[/quote][/b]

I really can't understand what you are trying to say.  But I think the answer is that Brock is a journalistic opportunist, as his track record demonstrates. You can't "tamp" that down if someone wants to print crazy stuff.[/quote]

Well sitting presidents have sat down with publishers of such publications like the NYT and asked them to not move forward or hold off on publishing stories that they believed would harm national security. Such as when the NYT broke a foreign financing program (my details are fuzzy, sorry), but it was during the Bush administration.

You're suggesting Bill wouldn't sit down with someone he believed was doing more harm than good to his and his family's reputation and ambitions?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics