Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Eminent domain by TransCanada for Keystone XL"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Eminent domain for energy infrastructure projects has been authorized by law for many years. See, for instance, the Natural Gas Act. I don't think any thinking person disputes the need for eminent domain in some cases, conservative or liberal. [/quote] Except, TransCanada is not a "common carrier" in the United States and should not be allowed to seize US land under eminent domain. Also, how does the product passing through the pipeline benefit the community? It clearly only benefits a private, foreign corporation.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
