Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "Acronyms used in this Forum"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=cjjaffe]The term "mental retardation" has been replaced in federal statutes with the term "intellectual disability" per Congress's passage of Rosa's law in 2010 due to its negative connotation. Even though much of the general public is not aware of this change, those who have a child with special needs certainly are. Therefore, I am requesting that the code "MR" for "Mentally Retarded" be changed to "ID" for "Intellectually Disabled".[/quote] Interesting issue. I always find that it's tough to balance the individual and Congressionally granted rights and responsibilities against those needs of the people within the forums still only familiar with the colloquialisms of the day. One thing that I would note is that Intellectually Disabled is a nebulous phrase, one that could apply to a host of disabilities. The ease with which MR is understood by the casual observers and commenters of the forum (never mind the parents who need help) is also an argument in its favor. What we get, then, is the question: How normative do we want our terms to be? And is it worse for those who will likely not read the forum to have the help they need, or to be referred to in a less accurate, but clearly more dignified manner. Even the removal of terms like "idiot," "imbecile," and others once referred to a specific range of IQ, one that might even be more helpful to this forum because of the ease with which those who have loved ones with those disorders can separate and associate together, sharing the information and discussing the common experiences that bind them together because of the ranges themselves. So at the end of the day, which is it? Accuracy and ease of identification or normative standards for language and its referents. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics