Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Scalia Can't Accurately Read Scalia"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous] . . on which he has his name on every single opinion. 120 to 180 per year. Plus they are hearing oral arguments in the morning. This is the time of the year when all the opinions come out in a rush before the close of court. You can't expect perfection from 9 justices x 4 clerks each x 100s of redrafts and 100s of administrators. If you've ever studied con law you know there are even some cases in which the Justices wrote the majority opinion, which later became the dissent and the original majority writer was so mad he didn't even change the language of the dissent. The Chief had taken the majority opinion away from the original Justice. So the dissent still starts with "The Court today decides the question of ........" Lots of behind-the-scenes politics we know nothing about. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
